<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before the Honeymoon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2006/05/before_the_honeymoon.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2006/05/before_the_honeymoon.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Corporate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2006/05/before_the_honeymoon.html/comment-page-1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devblog.redfin.com/blog/2006/05/before_the_honeymoon.html#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Ah, Glenn, you are always more candid than you should be, but that&#039;s a large part of your charm.

In any case, I think you&#039;re right on in this post.  One of the hardest things in a startup is to maintain a balance between the following two world views:  &quot;we have a great idea that is going to change the world&quot; and &quot;dammit, it doesn&#039;t work very well and no one wants it.&quot;  The former belief is what motivates smart people to do rock star-level work, but the latter is what motivates them to make it better.  I have seen far too many companies that focus too much on making the &quot;change the world&quot; belief into orthodoxy that can&#039;t be questioned.  It certainly happened once or twice at the &#039;Tree.  Once that happens, the company can&#039;t meet user expectations, because they aren&#039;t willing to question their basic beliefs about the company idea.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Glenn, you are always more candid than you should be, but that&#8217;s a large part of your charm.</p>
<p>In any case, I think you&#8217;re right on in this post.  One of the hardest things in a startup is to maintain a balance between the following two world views:  &#8220;we have a great idea that is going to change the world&#8221; and &#8220;dammit, it doesn&#8217;t work very well and no one wants it.&#8221;  The former belief is what motivates smart people to do rock star-level work, but the latter is what motivates them to make it better.  I have seen far too many companies that focus too much on making the &#8220;change the world&#8221; belief into orthodoxy that can&#8217;t be questioned.  It certainly happened once or twice at the &#8216;Tree.  Once that happens, the company can&#8217;t meet user expectations, because they aren&#8217;t willing to question their basic beliefs about the company idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

