<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correcting the Weighted Average in the Redfin Advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Corporate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:09:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Borges LL0SA= Broker FranklyRealty.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html/comment-page-1#comment-5043</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Borges LL0SA= Broker FranklyRealty.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html#comment-5043</guid>
		<description>Hey Lane, I found that in the DC area the seller subsidy is .75% worse. This is because ONLY DC discloses seller subsidy on the MLS. 

The Reason Redfin can&#039;t have as high seller subsidy is because of their rebate. Lenders combine the seller subsidy and rebates and don&#039;t allow that number to get too high. 

&lt;b&gt;HENCE having to adjust the offers accordingly to LOOK lower, when in fact the NET is NOT lower&lt;/b&gt;

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lane, I found that in the DC area the seller subsidy is .75% worse. This is because ONLY DC discloses seller subsidy on the MLS. </p>
<p>The Reason Redfin can&#8217;t have as high seller subsidy is because of their rebate. Lenders combine the seller subsidy and rebates and don&#8217;t allow that number to get too high. </p>
<p><b>HENCE having to adjust the offers accordingly to LOOK lower, when in fact the NET is NOT lower</b></p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane Bailey</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html/comment-page-1#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>Still wondering about seller paids...  I average a about 3% in seller paids on my buyer transactions.  (closing costs, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still wondering about seller paids&#8230;  I average a about 3% in seller paids on my buyer transactions.  (closing costs, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Miles</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html/comment-page-1#comment-2963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html#comment-2963</guid>
		<description>I meant to ask this in the previous post about this, but I forgot.  When calculating the p-value associated with the difference, did you take into account the clustering (non-independence) of individual sales within agents?  If you did, did that make a difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to ask this in the previous post about this, but I forgot.  When calculating the p-value associated with the difference, did you take into account the clustering (non-independence) of individual sales within agents?  If you did, did that make a difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redfin Advantage: Bigger, Broader, Higher Statistical Confidence &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html/comment-page-1#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redfin Advantage: Bigger, Broader, Higher Statistical Confidence &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/04/correcting_the_weighted_average_in_the_redfin_advantage.html#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>[...] 24, 2008 addition: Redfin is correcting how it calculates the weighted average in the Redfin Advantage report. Greg Wharton, the general counsel at my last job, liked to answer questions enigmatically. When I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 24, 2008 addition: Redfin is correcting how it calculates the weighted average in the Redfin Advantage report. Greg Wharton, the general counsel at my last job, liked to answer questions enigmatically. When I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
