<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating with Redfin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Corporate Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:09:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html/comment-page-1#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, very interesting. Like you said, I do hope that redfin.com continues to be used for positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, very interesting. Like you said, I do hope that redfin.com continues to be used for positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html/comment-page-1#comment-3025</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html#comment-3025</guid>
		<description>Complete inability to police the situation aside, if the answer to PriceChecker&#039;s questions is publicly available information, how can they call it cheating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete inability to police the situation aside, if the answer to PriceChecker&#8217;s questions is publicly available information, how can they call it cheating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Kelman</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html/comment-page-1#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Kelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 01:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/blog/2008/05/cheating_with_redfin.html#comment-3018</guid>
		<description>Definitely cheating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely cheating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
