March 24, 2008

Drama on Upton Street

pine2 Drama on Upton Street

My Upton Street neighbors repeatedly embarrass me in front of the entire city when they voice hollow concerns over the Pine Street Inn purchase of three townhouses on their street. Hope House currently owns and operates the townhouses as a transitional-living facility for up to seventy recovering addicts. It wants to sell all three units to the Pine Street Inn, which will continue using them as a transitional-living facility, but for only thirty-six residents. The sale hit a snag when some whiners decided they no longer want a shelter in the neighborhood. The Union Park Neighborhood Association (UPNA) is up in arms because they weren’t included in any negotiations.

I’m not sure why UPNA members feel like they should be included in any Pine Street Inn business. Even association president Jerry Frank, who moved to Upton Street several years after the opening of the Hope House facility, admitted the association is sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong. According to The South End News, Mr. Frank conceded:

“We’re going to find out how this happened, what the plans are … we want to address the economics of this, although it’s really not our business.”

Hope House used the townhouses in question as transitional-housing facility for over twenty-five years: probably longer than most of these whiney-assed Upton Street residents lived in the area. It’s unforgivable that these people saved a few bucks buying homes near a shelter, and now want to force the shelter out. Maybe they can push the Pine Street Inn onto some other less organized, less educated, less affluent families in some other neighborhood. Again, according to The South End News, Mr. Frank whimpered:

“We want to know why Pine Street Inn persists in pushing here when they know the neighbors object.”

Well, Jerry, the Pine Street Inn may not care that you don’t want it there. Keep in mind, you chose to move in to the neighborhood knowing what was there. Deal with it, Holmes.

Photo Source

Click here for more South End news and posts by Alyk


  • Daniel

    The Upton St. residents who decorated the front windows of their million-dollar properties with cartoons depicting themselves being "crushed" by Pine St. Inn are despicable human beings. I never walk my poodle down that street for that very reason.

  • jonathan

    there was some legitimacy to the opposition: It was a bit silly that transitional housing exists in a neighborhood with tiny, entry-level condos @ $450K, $25 dinners and imported cheese. Hope House could have sold this brownstone - made a killing - and purchased a much bigger, nicer facility in a slightly less gentrified neighborhood. Grandfathered zoning is the reason this occurred. And I'll spare you a history lesson - but take a look around Upton St and the South End, in general - and tell me this neighborhood is not already doing a tremendous amount to lift those less fortunate. If Back Bay / Beacon Hill had PSI moving onto one of their pretty brownstone streets - I'm quite sure you'd hear the exact same concerns. But the "drama" is over now - it seems that the logic of what was, shall be prevailed.

  • Michael

    I am currently doing a project on this topic in school and i would like to interview someone so if your interest just shot me a email at MichaelAlves88@yahoo.com

  • If there were less people in shelters wouldn't more people be out on the street?

  • Kristie

    That's so absurd and sad.

  • haha

    hmmm...
    the number 1492 comes to mind...
    and
    everything after that...
    is just history

  • andream

    Where are Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn when you need them?

  • Ta2dMom

    That doesn't even make any sense. Surely, they'd welcome LESS transient population, someone regulating things etc.?

  • April

    You're right Aly. the more I read the more irritated I got. Especially once I read it was permanent long term housing that they were planning. They have even MORE regulations in those types of programs then they do in transitional housing.

    Please keep us posted on this.

  • bigeddie

    I don't think they care where these people go, just as long as it's away from Upton Street. Maybe those a-holes could volunteer for the Inn, and make sure the houses are kept up on the outside. It's not really the best reason in the world to volunteer for anything, but it's a start.

  • jill

    Man the Pine Street Inn looks so good from the outside but is so so nasty on the inside, at least that's what the cop bf tells me. I don't know where these neighbors think these people will go, Christ, they're humans too. And it's not like it's in a super uppity up portion of the neighborhood, it's down the street from the bf's station which is down the street from the projects. Puh-lease ( as my 4 year old niece would say).

  • John

    Yup, I guess it's true.

    The South End really *is* over.

  • Katie Carson

    I only care about poor people in far away countries and, even then, only when my kids won't finish their dinner and I need a source of guilt on the double.

  • james

    They sound like a bunch of dumb-asses. It sounds like the association president is saying "wouldn't have had a problem if you just consulted us first, but because you didn't consult us, we you need to leave."

    When that yahoo said they got rid of 80% of the board members because they weren't listening to their concerns, did he mean they didn't support banning the Pine Street Inn? Were the concerns they weren't listening to the hollow concerns about the sale?

    What a jackass.

  • Lisa

    I want to know why they moved into the neighborhood in the first place if they knew the shelter was there? Appartently, rich people have no life so they need something to whine about.

  • April, you summed it up perfectly. Did you read the original post at The South End News? The more I read, the more embarrassed I was.

  • April

    So let me get this straight. The Pine Street Inn wants to REDUCE the number of people living in the transitional housing from 70 to 36 and the "neighbors" have a problem with this? They moved in knowing it was there and NOW have a problem with it?

    Sounds too much like Framingham politics to me.

blog comments powered by Disqus
close