Boston’s Dark Side: Luxury Overdevelopment
Yes, much as I like this town, I need to come to grips with a simple reality: developers aim too much of Boston’s housing at the wealthiest segments of society. This especially true in Back Bay and Beacon Hill.
A good case in point is the Clarendon Back Bay condos that recently hit MLS. The cheapest unit, a 589 sq. ft. studio, goes for an astronomical $695,000, or nearly $1200 per square foot. Other properties within the complex range from a modest 2 bed ($1300/sq. ft.) to a downright humble penthouse ($1600 sq. ft.). You know it’s bad news when people not receiving an economic stimulus check still can’t afford to buy in.
It’s an unfortunate side-effect of the region’s continued prosperity, really, and it’s not an easy thing to fix. After all, developers make a whole lot more money selling million-dollar condos than they do selling $200,000 condos. As long as we live in a society that values and runs on capitalism, we really can’t berate developers for wanting to make money, can we?
Plus, there’s no real consensus that developers are solely at fault for high prices. Despite limited redevelopment, Manhattan’s high end continues to rise, and unprepared buyers and overzealous agents may also share some of the blame.
But the good news is, if you believe in the efficient market hypothesis, the market will self-correct. An oversupply of luxury condos will result in reduced prices, meaning a few developers will lose big, dissuading others from investing in the already saturated market. In fact, a few recent examples suggest this may be happening already.
Let’s hope the trend toward sanity continues into Beacon Hill and the Back Bay.
More on Back Back Bay and Beacon Hill from Cosmo Catalano
Image: Croesus Receiving Tribute from a Lydian Peasant. Claude Vignon, 1629. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.