How My Landlord Court Case Ended

Late last night someone posted on the blog, wanting to know the outcome of my small-claims lawsuit against my landlord that I blogged about a couple of months ago.

To recap, we moved from our expensive Beverly Grove apartment in June. for-rent-photo.jpgWe were model tenants, and I thought the landlord and I had a decent relationship, so I didn’t do the things you’re supposed to do when you move out, such as invite the landlord over for an inspection and agree on repairs.  I fully expected to get back our entire deposit; instead, she took out $600 for “paint touch-up,” cleaning, water spots on the cabinets, and scratches on the wood floor.

According to the civil code pertaining to security deposits, landlords are not allowed to charge tenants for normal wear and tear. I had cleaned the apartment before I left, and as far as the floor and the cabinets, I had no idea what she was talking about.  And there was no doubt that she was not allowed to charge for paint touch-up, which is definitely wear and tear.

I sent her a letter demanding my money and didn’t hear back, so I filed a small-claims lawsuit against her and had her served.  Apparently you can sue for two or three times the amount due to bad faith, but all I wanted was my money back.

Before my landlord got served, she sent me a certified letter with a check for $100, explaining that she had accidentally charged me for window cleaning.  It was clear that she was surprised at being challenged, and she probably hadn’t boned up on tenant law until my letter. 

About a week before the case was due to go to court, she called me to negotiate.  I didn’t want to talk to her, so my husband did. She told him that she had had to get the curtains cleaned, which I frankly forgot about, and that the trashcan that had been installed on runners under the sink was missing. I think that trashcan was in the storage unit and had been tossed out.

Because of that, my husband agreed to split the difference, so we got another $300.  But with the court filing and the service fee, I was out another $85.

I could have refused to settle, but the truth was, I didn’t want to go to court.  Not only did the idea of standing in front of a judge make me nervous — I have a pronounced phobia of public speaking — but I wasn’t completely sure I would win. 

I know I had a good case, but because I hadn’t done the things you’re supposed to do when you rent, like a walk-through upon move-in and move-out, it might have been a my-word-against-hers situation.  But California tenant law definitely favors the tenant.  And the fact that she provided no receipts to back up her claims of repairs was in my favor:  Landlords have to provide documentation that the repairs they claim were made were actually made.

I think she will think twice about making arbitrary deductions from security deposits from now on.  And I will take some lessons from this, too. 

My advice to renters: Familiarize yourself with California’s law regarding security deposits.  And conduct a move-in and move-out inspection with the landlord using a form like this.  There’s almost no chance of surprises that way. No matter how nice your landlord seems — and mine seemed VERY nice — don’t trust; verify.

Recent Redfin posts:
Silver Lake Gets Needed Traffic Light
The Subcompact Hybrid:  Good Choice for Parking in Rossmoyne
How to Commit Fraud and Get Loans Approved

Related Posts

  • http://www.los-angeles-real-estate-blog.com Phyllis Harb

    I think you did the right thing, you probably would have prevailed in court… but then again you never know.

    Too much negative energy in fighting and what about your time lost in a day or half a day in court? Good decision.

  • Klutz

    If anyone has any questions regarding their rights as a tenant in California or feels just plain ripped-off by an unscrupulous landlord I HIGHLY recommend http://www.caltenantlaw,com for information on your rights in this state.

    Did you know late fees are illegal on residential properties? Fascinating and enlightening stuff!

  • traci

    so do you know for sure that paint touchups are not the responsibility of the tenant? it totally makes sense that it’s wear and tear, but i think i’ve been charged for it everywhere i’ve lived. i think the witch from the place i just moved out is planning to charge me b/c she noted a bunch of paint touch up areas.

  • Cindy Allen

    Hi, Traci,

    I am positive painting is not required. The only time you can be charged for painting is if it’s part of damage repair, like a wall you kicked through and had to be replaced. Here’s a link:

    http://www.caltenantlaw.com/Deposit.htm

    And here’s the quote:

    Painting is not required, nor is filling in nail holes. These are not valid deductions. Minor scratches are generally normal wear and tear. You should remove all trash and furnishings that are yours; if you don’t you may have the cost of their removal deducted from your deposit.

    These landlords either don’t know the law or are banking on you not knowing it. Read that link, familiarize yourself with what it says, and file a claim against your landlord!

  • http://www.edhardyworld.co.uk ed hardy

    The only time you can be charged for painting is if it’s part of damage repair, like a wall you kicked through and had to be replaced. Here’s a link

  • Joe

    A landlord can charge for nail holes and paint under certain conditions.

    California law specifically allows the landlord to use a tenant’s security deposit for four purposes:
    • For unpaid rent;
    • For cleaning the rental unit when the tenant moves out, but only to make the unit as clean as it was when the tenant first moved in;214
    • For repair of damages, other than normal wear and tear, caused by the tenant or the tenant’s guests; and
    • if the lease or rental agreement allows it, for the cost of restoring or replacing furniture, furnishings, or other items of personal property (including keys), other than because of normal wear and tear.215
    A landlord can withhold from the security deposit only those amounts that are reasonably necessary for these purposes. the security deposit cannot be used for repairing defects that existed in the unit before you moved in, for conditions caused by normal wear and tear during your tenancy or previous tenancies, or for cleaning a rental unit that is as clean as it was when you moved in.216 A rental agreement or lease can never state that a security deposit is “nonrefundable.”217

  • sciquest

    http://www.dca.ca.gov/publicat

    2. Carpets and drapes – “useful life” rule
    Normal wear and tear to carpets, drapes and other furnishings cannot be charged against a tenant's security deposit. Normal wear and tear includes simple wearing down of carpet and drapes
    because of normal use or aging, and ***includes moderate dirt or
    spotting.***

    According to the DCA, moderate dirt and spotting on the carpet relate to wear and tear, not the level of cleanness, and therefore shouldn't be a basis for a deduction. This seems to be exactly opposite to the way most people seem to be interpreting “to make the unit as clean as it was when the tenant first moved in.”

    Can anyone cite sources to clarify, such as an official definition of “wear and tear?”