Case-Shiller: LA-Area Home Price Losses Increase in February

It’s time for our monthly check-in of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (HPI). The Case-Shiller data is generally considered to be the most reliable measure of overall home price changes for a region, since they only consider repeat sales of homes when calculating their index, instead of looking at all the homes that sold in a given month.

For the full source data behind this post, hit the S&P/Case-Shiller website. For a more detailed explanation of how the Case-Shiller Home Price Index is calculated, check out their methodology pdf. Also remember that the data released on the last Tuesday of a given month is for the period two months prior (i.e. – February data is released in April).

Here are the basic Case-Shiller stats for Los Angeles area (which Case-Shiller defines as LA and Orange Counties) as of February:

February 2011
Month to Month: Down 1.0%
Year to Year: Down 2.1%
Prices at this level in: September 2003
Peak month: September 2006
Change from Peak: Down 38.6% in 53 months
Low Tier: Under $302,281
Mid Tier: $302,281 to $491,853
Hi Tier: Over $491,853

Nineteen of the twenty metro areas tracked by Case-Shiller saw a decrease in their HPI between January and February (the same as December to January). Detroit of all places was the only city that saw a month-to-month gain (up 1.0%).

Here’s a look at the latest local tiered data, back through 2000:


And here’s a closer look at the recent changes, with the vertical and horizontal axes zoomed in to show just the last year:


All three of LA’s price tiers took a hit in February, but the middle tier fell the furthest. Month to month, the low tier was down 0.7%, the middle tier fell 1.4%, and the high tier decreased 0.8%.

Here’s a chart of Case-Shiller HPIs for all the markets that Redfin serves:


Here’s our peak decline chart, in which we line up the peak Case-Shiller HPI value for each of Redfin’s markets, so we can see how long each market has been declining, and how much it has dropped from the peak.


Ten of the twenty cities tracked by Case-Shiller hit another new post-peak low as of February. The 20-city composite index sits just barely above its April 2009 post-peak low (139.27 in February vs. 139.26 in April 2009).

Methodology: The Case-Shiller index tracks price changes in sets of homes of similar size and style to better determine changes in what people are willing to pay for the same home over time. If data is available from an earlier transaction for the same home, the two sales are paired and treated as a “repeat sale.” Repeat sales that are too far apart, sales between family members, lot splits, remodels, and property type changes (e.g. from single-family to condos) are excluded from the calculations. All remaining repeat sales are totaled together and weighted based on the time between each sale, then the data for the most recent three months is averaged together to create a given month’s index value (i.e. – September’s index represents the average of the data from July through September).

The three price tiers plotted in the charts below simply represent the top, middle, and bottom third of all sales, based on the initial sale price. In other words, if there were 3,000 sales in the three-month period, 1,000 of them would be in the low tier, 1,000 in the middle tier, and 1,000 in the high tier, by definition.

  • Pingback: Case-Shiller: OC-Area Home Price Losses Increase in February | Redfin Orange County Sweet Digs

  • sam123

    is there any similar data on Santa Monica? It seems that Santa Monica follows its own trend. Cost per sqf seems higher now than in 2008 or 2009. People seem willing to buy at still pretty inflated prices. I'd like to understand the Santa Monica market a bit better and it does not make much sense. Some comparable properties are sold with very high price differences among them. How is it possible?

  • muskoka cottage rentals

    your blog is very good,wish I could like you