August 8, 2007

The Supply & Demand of Housing Market

In my job as a real estate appraiser, I analyze market value for every home I inspect. Today’s market is as confusing for me as it is for you. As I see home prices all over the map, I have been spending many long nights at my computer with the MLS (Multiple Listing Service) and my public records data, Real Quest, trying to make some sense of it. I have noticed that in every area that I work in (northern Los Angeles County), I find one or two properties that sold or listed below market value for the area. In my attempt to search out an answer why this trend is happening, I have concluded that many sellers are being pressured by their listing agents to under-cut the market, so they can generate a quick sale.

Just two years ago, realtors were selling their listed property before it even hit the MLS. They were getting multiple bids, pushing the selling price over and above what the seller was asking. This is why home prices escalated so fast. Agents were spoiled by this buying frenzy and made a lot of money in a very short amount of time. Now typical marketing times, or days on market, in the areas that I work in, runs approximately 90 days. This is actually considered normal. Before the housing boom that ran from 2002-2005, it was typical to see a house marketed for sale anywhere from 3 to 6 months. So now that we are back to a time where a realtor has to actually spend some money and time on advertising, open houses and flyers, they don’t like it. A few months ago, I was appraising a house in Mission Hills, CA. The owner told me that he was considering selling the house and asked if I could recommend a good listing agent. I called a friend of mine and told him about the lead. My friend said to me, “ Oh Ron, by the time I spend money on advertising and having to wait 120 days or more on the market …and maybe the house won’t sell; It’s not worth it for me. I am gonna have to pass.” Several other listing agents that I have talked to also echo his response. Therefore, I noticed, by talking to sellers, agents are pressuring their clients to lower their listed price below market value, so that the agent will make the sale and get commission from the deal. Again, I have seen this happen in my own neighborhood. In an adjacent housing tract, most of the homes are selling in the low $800,000, but there is one house that is listed at $715,000. The agent’s comments in the MLS reads, “ The lowest priced home in the tract. Great Deal! Come grab it now!” But no one has grabbed it. It has been on the market for 6 months because every buyer thinks there is something wrong with it. This proves my theory that a low price will not guarantee a fast sale.

I am not down on all realtors. Many of them are good, hard working, reputable and honest people. If the home has been priced correctly and they don’t receive a good offer in a reasonable amount of time, they tell their clients to take their home off the market and consider re-listing their house in 6-8 months from now. If you do not have to sell, take your home off the market. Remember the basic theory of supply and demand. If the housing inventory shrinks, demand will increase. Wait till you see a number of active listings in your neighborhood come off the market, and then consider re-listing your house. And don’t let an agent talk you into anything you are uncomfortable with.

More advice to come…


  • Hi Ron!

    I just love your posts. I have the idea that we'd really hit it off in a face to face real estate dialogue...
    And now... my thoughts. There is always a break point (although not so black and white) where a home will sell at a certain price. For the purposes of my line of thought here, it's not the time on market that matters, but the price of the home when it sells. So let's say I price a home at 875k, it sits for one month, then I drop it to 855k, and it sits another month. I may drop it to 825k, it's on the market for 20 days or so, and I get a contract/offer. The price that matters is the price that brings in the contract. That's also the length of time that matters as well. So when I consider how inventory is moving, I don't weigh the operpriced homes as much I weigh those that are selling. How do I know where to price a home? At the price point comparable properties are moving. It doesn't matter what price houses that aren't selling are priced at.

    I think it's horrible that any agent would pressure their seller to underprice. I can understand not wishing to overprice, but an agent who wants the seller to underprice is really in the wrong field... I can't imagine they'd get far doing business like that.
  • Tim K.
    Who cares if it is $800K or $715K if the house really is only worth $300K? It's still overpriced. There is a huge market of buyers who are telling you exactly that.

    You can try to tell yourself it's just "marketing", but at its core, it's too expensive.
  • Qbert
    Given the unreasonable price run up of the past two years, both the $800 and $715k houses are likely over priced. Next year will certainly see lower prices across the board, so “getting out” now or planning to stay put for a few years is the decision.
  • peninsula
    You said:

    In an adjacent housing tract, most of the homes are selling in the low $800,000, but there is one house that is listed at $715,000. ... It has been on the market for 6 months because every buyer thinks there is something wrong with it. This proves my theory that a low price will not guarantee a fast sale.

    If this house is listed $100,000 cheaper, and it's not selling, then there must be something wrong with it. Buyers won't hesitate to jump on a good deal, so clearly, this one isn't a good deal. I really don't think this proves anything, except maybe that they need to lower the price even more if they want to sell this year.
blog comments powered by Disqus
close