June 4, 2008

The Decline of the Far-Flung Suburb

The three most important considerations in buying a home, the old real-estate adage goes, are: location, location, location. 

What does that mean?  It means buying a piece of property that’s in a place where lots of people want to live.  That’s why properties in big cities and near the coast tend to hold their value better, in good times and bad.

Tuesday’s installment of the L.A. Times’ “Foreclosure Front” series focuses on Merced, a Central Valley city that developers went crazy for during the boom and is now replete with foreclosures and half-finished houses.

I’m sure some nice people live in Merced, but let’s be frank:  Merced is not a place where lots of people aspire to live. What’s the number-one thing Merced has, or had, to offer?  Answer:  Big, new, relatively cheap houses.suburbs The Decline of the Far Flung Suburb

The lure of big, cheap houses brought tens of thousands of people into places like Palmdale, Lancaster, Victorville and Lake Elsinore, too.  But when the big, cheap houses stop appreciating, these places don’t look nearly so attractive as places to live anymore. 

That’s why buying a house on the basis of price alone is a bad idea.  If the No. 1 positive feature about a place is big, cheap houses, you’re probably better off not buying there — especially now, when those places are filled with large numbers of abandoned homes.

And until rising gas prices magically reverse themselves, the lifestyle of buying a big, cheap house in a faraway place and commuting will be not only undesirable, but economically unfeasible.

That’s one reason why some experts are predicting that Americans will abandon far-flung suburbs in droves.  Consider this excerpt from a recent article in The Atlantic entitled “The Next Slum?”:

For 60 years, Americans have pushed steadily into the suburbs, transforming the landscape and (until recently) leaving cities behind. But today the pendulum is swinging back toward urban living, and there are many reasons to believe this swing will continue. As it does, many low-density suburbs and McMansion subdivisions, including some that are lovely and affluent today, may become what inner cities became in the 1960s and ’70s—slums characterized by poverty, crime, and decay.

A big house for less money is tempting, but more people are realizing that quality of life counts.  If you’re buying or renting, the best “location” these days is close to employment centers and amenities — preferably within walking distance.

Recent Redfin posts:
Down in the Trenches with the Foreclosed-Upon
Did These Buyers Get a Deal?


  • Red
    It is funny that people are abandoning the far flung suburbs for a minor increase in gas cost when the time value is far greater. I figure that for every mile a place is further out, the price needs to drop by about $9,000.
    One mile further is 480 miles a year, which is about 12 hours at 40mph, if your salary is $100K thats $480; and at $4.00 a gallon and 30mpg, thats 16 gallons and $64 for total of $544. a year. With a 6% interest rate, that $544 will pay for $9066 worth of mortgage.
    I see lots of folks with 30 mile commutes past perfectly decent homes closer in; were those remote homes $270,000 cheaper?
    Maybe they are now.
  • I'm a complete urban dweller. I've gotta live near stuff. I live in one of the most walkable neighborhoods in L.A. and love it!
  • Thanks, Christopher! I'm a poster child for this trend. I lived in the 'burbs all of my adult life after growing up in the city (Philadelphia). Now that I'm in the heart of L.A., I can't imagine going back. I, too, could buy a nice house 30 miles away, but why? I want to live and work in the same vicinity. You can't believe how much better it makes you feel! You have so much more time, so much less stress! Everyone should try it.
  • Awesome post.

    Expensive gas = Cheap suburbs.
blog comments powered by Disqus
close