July 28, 2008

Free Dodger Stadium Trolley Debuts but 50-Year Plan Ignores Transit

baseball Free Dodger Stadium Trolley Debuts but 50 Year Plan Ignores TransitThis low-mileage review covers a local sports venue instead of real estate, but those looking to buy a home in Glendale or Pasadena will be affected by Dodger game traffic if they drive between downtown Los Angeles and the two cities to the north, so excuse the digression, and be warned.

Blogdowntown reported that many fans lined up to catch the first free trolley to Dodger stadium July 25; city officials rode along as well.

The trolley is great news for those of us living farther from the stadium than this intrepid writer, who recently decided to walk two miles to a game instead of driving to the parking lot.

Dodger fans using the service will save a few dollars on parking and gas, but I doubt it will noticeably reduce pre- and post-game gridlock. Eliminating that will take a full-scale transit plan, which does not appear in the Dodger’s “Next 50″ initiative, as blogger Militant Angeleno points out.

Militant Angeleno also wrote that he and other trolley riders didn’t get out of the stadium parking lot any faster than fans driving their own cars on Friday night. Perhaps the Dodgers could clear a special lane for the trolley so riders can save time as well as money.

As I wrote, the trolley service is great news. However, it does not remove the bottleneck that baseball games create in the surrounding neighborhood. The Dodgers’ five year renovation plan includes a new entrance, plaza, restaurants, shops, a museum space, a central ticketing facility, and two terraced parking structures. So within five years, cars will be stacked vertically as well as horizontally, and there will still be no clear alternative to parking.

Why not reduce the number of parking spaces (as Pasadena appears to be considering for its business districts), and increase the number of transit options for fans coming from all directions? That’s certainly more appropriate for a plan intended to take the Dodgers through the next 50 years.

As for bike parking, a StreetsblogLA cyclist at first couldn’t locate the bike racks at Dodger Stadium. When they were located, this post reported they were right next to the designated smoking area. Again, a plan for the Dodgers’ next 50 years should take the growing population of cyclists into account.

I will suggest another building project for the plan, one I’ve seen in place at other major league ballparks: a Little League field, complete with stands, snack bar, restrooms, and scoreboard, built on the grounds of the parking lot. It will further reduce parking lot area, add green space, and give neighborhood leagues another available field.


  • Brock Willis
    aol72dp6xsge3ln1
  • carlivar
    Metrolink would help, but is not ideal. It does not run often enough.

    Getty Museum has a railed tram of some sort, paid for by the Getty Trust I suppose. Not sure where L.A. can get that sort of money. Plus the Getty shuttle was built on unoccupied land. Good luck with the right of way from the Metrolink tracks and across the 5 freeway...
  • Elise Kalfayan
    Moving Dodger Stadium? I am somewhat sentimental as well, and I can't imagine attending a Dodger game without seeing the hills to the north and the downtown skyline to the south.

    I certainly agree that Chavez Ravine is not suited to public transit. But those who drafted the 50-year plan should have included some long-range, creative options in this area.

    Since you asked for some detail, I thought a little about it myself and came up with this: Add another Metrolink stop just north of the stadium, to be used only for stadium events, and install Getty Museum-type shuttle services at both this stop and Union Station.
  • carlivar
    I was thinking about this some more. Perhaps it is blasphemous, but really the best solution is for the Dodgers to build a new park somewhere with frequent train service. Downtown, perhaps?

    Dodger Stadium could convert into an NFL facility. The location is much more suited to the 8-games-a-year NFL rather than frequent baseball games.

    The new Dodgers park could be built using Ebbets Field as an inspiration. This would satisfy the sentimentalists like me. Or perhaps Wrigley Field (Los Angeles version) could be rebuilt. Or even Gilmore Field?
  • carlivar
    When you say "increase the number of transit options" could you go into more details? That's an easy statement to make but does not sound very grounded in reality.

    Let's face it: no one cares about buses. Ballparks with successful mass transit have a TRAIN. For example: both Chicago ballparks. Both New York ballparks. Both Bay Area ballparks. Even the San Diego Padres park.

    The reality is that Chavez Ravine is too secluded for its own good. I doubt it would be cost effective to add train service near Dodger Stadium, though a train could certainly be quite useful getting somewhat close to Dodger Stadium -- Echo Park or Silver Lake.

    Dodger Stadium was built at the height of the car's popularity and it shows. It's not an easy problem to fix. Making vague statements like "improving transportation" is easy but pointless. We also need to "reduce the deficit". That's easy to say but hard to do.

    By the way, allowing tailgating would help with traffic congestion into the park. More people would arrive earlier.
blog comments powered by Disqus
close