<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sales Up for the First Time Since &#8217;05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Los Angeles Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Do Bank Sales Figure in Home-Sales Data? &#124; Redfin Los Angeles Sweet Digs</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-16104</link>
		<dc:creator>How Do Bank Sales Figure in Home-Sales Data? &#124; Redfin Los Angeles Sweet Digs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-16104</guid>
		<description>[...] week, I wrote a post about home sales in SoCal in July being up year over year for the first time in three years.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, I wrote a post about home sales in SoCal in July being up year over year for the first time in three years.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15826</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15826</guid>
		<description>Well, here in toluca lake my best friend just found out that even though his credit score is 801 (I know, amazing) and he makes $150K a year as an editor for one of the studios, that he only qualifies for a $500K loan.

Since the lowest end houses around here are still going for $700K+ (realistically more like $800K plus), it seems there is a huge gap between reality and fantasy for banks and potential buyers, even for those who happen to have stable well-paid jobs and a 10% downpayment.

Just a datapoint, throwing it out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here in toluca lake my best friend just found out that even though his credit score is 801 (I know, amazing) and he makes $150K a year as an editor for one of the studios, that he only qualifies for a $500K loan.</p>
<p>Since the lowest end houses around here are still going for $700K+ (realistically more like $800K plus), it seems there is a huge gap between reality and fantasy for banks and potential buyers, even for those who happen to have stable well-paid jobs and a 10% downpayment.</p>
<p>Just a datapoint, throwing it out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Miles</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15806</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15806</guid>
		<description>I think it was in the LA Land blog that they reported that in the last house price collapse, prices bottomed out four years after sales bottomed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was in the LA Land blog that they reported that in the last house price collapse, prices bottomed out four years after sales bottomed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15802</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15802</guid>
		<description>Cindy,

Just delete his posts.  He&#039;s really not adding anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy,</p>
<p>Just delete his posts.  He&#8217;s really not adding anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15801</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15801</guid>
		<description>Hi, Workafrolic:  Excellent question. You&#039;re right:  There are a lot of lenders that are buying back properties, and I&#039;m quite sure they get recorded as sales in the recorder&#039;s office and tallied in with the monthly sales figures.  I&#039;ve put in a call to DataQuick to try to get an answer.  If I hear back, I will post here.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Workafrolic:  Excellent question. You&#8217;re right:  There are a lot of lenders that are buying back properties, and I&#8217;m quite sure they get recorded as sales in the recorder&#8217;s office and tallied in with the monthly sales figures.  I&#8217;ve put in a call to DataQuick to try to get an answer.  If I hear back, I will post here.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Allen</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15800</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15800</guid>
		<description>Andrew Waite:  Please stop with the condescending asides directed at me, or I will delete your posts.  Disagree with what&#039;s written all you want, but do not get personal.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Waite:  Please stop with the condescending asides directed at me, or I will delete your posts.  Disagree with what&#8217;s written all you want, but do not get personal.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Workafrolic</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15793</link>
		<dc:creator>Workafrolic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15793</guid>
		<description>OK, this one got me so upset that I actually emailed the radio station on which I first heard the story.  Sales are up and prices are down so they concluded that more people are buying houses.  Simple, right?  But, here is the key question:  what happens to the numbers when you regularize for foreclosures?  As I understand it, when the bank forecloses, the transaction counts as a sale because it&#039;s a change in ownership.  But that doesn&#039;t mean that more people (like you or I) are actually buying houses.  That could be the case, but until you subtract out the foreclosures, we won&#039;t know.  Since the outstanding loan amount on foreclosures is usually less than what the house would have sold for last year, it can look like a drop in price.  BUT ... that doesn&#039;t mean that listing prices have come down significantly.  Anecdotally, a lot of would-be home buyers are seeing a continuing lack of realism in listing prices, and I&#039;ll bet every seller who heard the news story had the desire to put their price back up on that basis. 

Can DataQuick back out the foreclosures?  I&#039;m told the figure is usually a ragged number (the outstanding loan balance, not a usual negotiated amount) so if someone could run some logic on this, it would be VERY helpful to know.  ~W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this one got me so upset that I actually emailed the radio station on which I first heard the story.  Sales are up and prices are down so they concluded that more people are buying houses.  Simple, right?  But, here is the key question:  what happens to the numbers when you regularize for foreclosures?  As I understand it, when the bank forecloses, the transaction counts as a sale because it&#8217;s a change in ownership.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean that more people (like you or I) are actually buying houses.  That could be the case, but until you subtract out the foreclosures, we won&#8217;t know.  Since the outstanding loan amount on foreclosures is usually less than what the house would have sold for last year, it can look like a drop in price.  BUT &#8230; that doesn&#8217;t mean that listing prices have come down significantly.  Anecdotally, a lot of would-be home buyers are seeing a continuing lack of realism in listing prices, and I&#8217;ll bet every seller who heard the news story had the desire to put their price back up on that basis. </p>
<p>Can DataQuick back out the foreclosures?  I&#8217;m told the figure is usually a ragged number (the outstanding loan balance, not a usual negotiated amount) so if someone could run some logic on this, it would be VERY helpful to know.  ~W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Waite</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-15792</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/losangeles/2008/08/sales_up_for_the_first_time_since_05.html#comment-15792</guid>
		<description>Well I guess poor Cindy missed the market again. 

Three things have been happening since Jan 08, invesntory has been shrinking in better neighborhoods first and have now crept from 5 to 3 star neighborhoods. Pending contracts and now closed sales are up and the cost per aquare foot is rising from often below replacement cost to a reasonably profitable point. Widespread price stability by January 09 and return to predictable appreciation although probably less than historic annual 5%. 

Come out from under the bed people....it was only bad for folks that made ill-advised decisions or have their attitude on upside down!

Best. Andrew Waite
Best A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess poor Cindy missed the market again. </p>
<p>Three things have been happening since Jan 08, invesntory has been shrinking in better neighborhoods first and have now crept from 5 to 3 star neighborhoods. Pending contracts and now closed sales are up and the cost per aquare foot is rising from often below replacement cost to a reasonably profitable point. Widespread price stability by January 09 and return to predictable appreciation although probably less than historic annual 5%. </p>
<p>Come out from under the bed people&#8230;.it was only bad for folks that made ill-advised decisions or have their attitude on upside down!</p>
<p>Best. Andrew Waite<br />
Best A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

