January 16, 2008

Affordable Housing in East County

You probably know that these days affordable housing often means subsidized housing for renters and buyers. Let’s take a look at how this works using the following extract from a recent city document:

Regional Housing Needs Assessment

To ensure that there is adequate housing stock to meet the demands for Californian residents, the State of California has mandated that City’s provide housing opportunities in their communities. The housing development goals come in the form of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) figures. These RHNA figures are broken into affordability categories. Lemon Grove was given the housing production targets below in 2005:

Housing Type
Target # % of Total Who Qualifies*
Very Low 46 19% Less than $35,100
Low 32 13% Less than $56,150
Moderate 46 19% Less than $69,400
Above Moderate 118 49% Above $69,400

*Based on household income for a family of four

In order to ensure cities take an aggressive approach in meeting RHNA targets, the State is working toward holding back grant funding and transportation funding for those cities that do not make efforts in meeting the targets. For Lemon Grove, this will have a significant impact on funding for street improvements and park infrastructure projects.

What that means is that cities have incentive to support low income housing. Lemon Grove is working to meet these goals in various ways. One is a condo project on a small block facing Broadway which presently contains a donut shop and an empty house. This will likely have 36 small condos and about 2,200 sq. ft. of commercial space. The project requires a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Reclassification and accommodating commercial & residential neighbors. Density will be higher than normally allowed (expect such exceptions in your city too).

Another proposed project will have 25 units and more are under consideration.

The community receives significant funding for affordable housing but pays in other ways. Higher density, increased crowding of street parking, increased use of other infrastructure including water, energy, sewers, schools and possibly fire & safety resources all become added expenses. This is balanced with increased tax revenues, local business profits and more effective use of neglected land.

For regular buyers and sellers, subsidized housing could translate to increased downward pressure on prices in the area where it appears.

If you are a real estate pro, a local resident or shopping for a home you may wish to be informed about such activities in your area of interest. City governments are required to make such information public and much of it is available on the internet and at libraries. In Lemon Grove the City Manager and the City Planner are quite helpful with information about these proposals.


Comments (4)

Foreclosures Up, Median Prices Down | Redfin San Diego Sweet Digs said:

[...] Lemon Grove, Spring Valley « Affordable Housing in East County [...]

Carol said:

I spent many years developing affordable housing and it is a misnomer that such properties adversely affect surrounding property values. One of my favorite tools in the field is inclusionary zoning which is a fantastic way to incorporate affordability within a community. Often, new affordable housing developments can actually help raise property values, with the exception of public housing which San Diego is moving away from altogether http://sandiego.redfin.com/blog/2007/09/public_vs_subsidized_housing_-_whats_the_dif.html

Tom Swell said:

Thanks for the links, Carol. Inclusionary zoning (IZ)is a step forward in solving a serious housing problem. There is much more to do. One of my recent correspondents was considering infill housing for instance.

I only spent 2 years developing low and very low income housing but I expect to return to it when I find the right project. I have never pretended that my work was welcome in the community. Many fiercely opposed these projects and many welcomed them. The difference was directly related to how close they lived to the project.

The ‘policylink’ link above includes this statement:
“The strongest opposition to an IZ policy comes from private developers, the real estate community and public officials opposed to affordable housing.”
– To me this is completely ridiculous. I have never seen such resistance except when developers are forced to include affordable housing in a luxury project. My experience is that all the above see affordable housing as a necessity and a source of federal money.

It is the neighbors who strenuously object. They have invested their money, time and a portion of their lives and their children’s lives to their community and have every right to be concerned about a dramatic change proposed by outsiders.

It should be obvious that those communities with a voice have prevented the incursion of poor people. The poor, the sick, the sexual offenders are housed where residents don’t have the strength to fight it: struggling neighborhoods where people work multiple jobs to feed their families and spend their ’spare time’ fixing the family car and clipping grocery coupons. If property values sometimes go up, it is because they have nowhere else to go.

Post your comment




close