<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You a Bottom Feeder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html</link>
	<description>Redfin San Diego Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html/comment-page-1#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>$505k is the median home price for San Diego County as set by the Federal Housing Administration.  $517k was the high in Nov &#039;05 and is consistent with what the SDUT reported in the article Paul referenced.

I sure would like to see prices continue to come down, though I&#039;m not sure I agree that we are only one year into the decline or that time alone is the right measurement.  I do agree that other things are contributing (the economy, stock market, recession fears, et al).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$505k is the median home price for San Diego County as set by the Federal Housing Administration.  $517k was the high in Nov &#8217;05 and is consistent with what the SDUT reported in the article Paul referenced.</p>
<p>I sure would like to see prices continue to come down, though I&#8217;m not sure I agree that we are only one year into the decline or that time alone is the right measurement.  I do agree that other things are contributing (the economy, stock market, recession fears, et al).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html/comment-page-1#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>Not sure where you get your numbers:  $517k and $505k seem to be way off.  Here is what the Union Tribune reported:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20080213-9999-1n13housing.html#name

There numbers are really very different.  $472k and $429k are the y-o-y numbers.  I can&#039;t remember what the peak was, however it was much higher than $472k.   Those numbers included all=condo&#039;s, resale SFR and new construction.  Even if you just go with resale SFR numbers, you&#039;re still way off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure where you get your numbers:  $517k and $505k seem to be way off.  Here is what the Union Tribune reported:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20080213-9999-1n13housing.html#name" rel="nofollow">http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20080213-9999-1n13housing.html#name</a></p>
<p>There numbers are really very different.  $472k and $429k are the y-o-y numbers.  I can&#8217;t remember what the peak was, however it was much higher than $472k.   Those numbers included all=condo&#8217;s, resale SFR and new construction.  Even if you just go with resale SFR numbers, you&#8217;re still way off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html/comment-page-1#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/02/are_you_a_bottom_feeder.html#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>RE: Even so, home prices really haven’t fallen as substantially as some had hoped they would by now.

It took 6 years to build this bubble, it&#039;s not going to bottom in 1 year.  It&#039;s a slow painful unwinding process that is just beginning.  Look for 2008-2010 to be painful years as money is tight, inventory is high, and buyers are scared.  Homes are not as liquid as stocks that can correct in weeks so don&#039;t expect this market to play out quickly.  I would expect at least 50% of the time it took to build the bubble, so maybe 2009 might be the middle of the decline.  Just a thought.  I am not an expert, but then again I waited and didn&#039;t buy in 2006 when all the so called experts said there was nothing to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Even so, home prices really haven’t fallen as substantially as some had hoped they would by now.</p>
<p>It took 6 years to build this bubble, it&#8217;s not going to bottom in 1 year.  It&#8217;s a slow painful unwinding process that is just beginning.  Look for 2008-2010 to be painful years as money is tight, inventory is high, and buyers are scared.  Homes are not as liquid as stocks that can correct in weeks so don&#8217;t expect this market to play out quickly.  I would expect at least 50% of the time it took to build the bubble, so maybe 2009 might be the middle of the decline.  Just a thought.  I am not an expert, but then again I waited and didn&#8217;t buy in 2006 when all the so called experts said there was nothing to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

