<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaw Dropping Deals &#8211; Single Family Homes Priced Under Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html</link>
	<description>Redfin San Diego Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html/comment-page-1#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t that long ago we were remarking about decent one and two bedroom condos under $400,000.  Single family homes under $300,000 anywhere in this region are still an anomoly.  UH does seem to  be holding onto higher asking prices and valuations, though, especially compared to neighboring North Park and pockets a little further east.

Thanks for your comments.  I have actually been watching that particular property for a while.  If it comes down anywhere near $175,000 I&#039;ll put a shout out.  If you catch it falling first let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t that long ago we were remarking about decent one and two bedroom condos under $400,000.  Single family homes under $300,000 anywhere in this region are still an anomoly.  UH does seem to  be holding onto higher asking prices and valuations, though, especially compared to neighboring North Park and pockets a little further east.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.  I have actually been watching that particular property for a while.  If it comes down anywhere near $175,000 I&#8217;ll put a shout out.  If you catch it falling first let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $415/sqf</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html/comment-page-1#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>$415/sqf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that $415/sqf for a shoebox in University Heights is not a jaw-dropping deal.  When it breaches $200K, it begins to get into plausible territory.  When it breaches $175K, it actually might make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that $415/sqf for a shoebox in University Heights is not a jaw-dropping deal.  When it breaches $200K, it begins to get into plausible territory.  When it breaches $175K, it actually might make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html/comment-page-1#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>The past sales data says it last sold for $345,000 on 1/18/08 but you&#039;re still correct.  You&#039;ll need to follow the link to the complete listing data though I note that the immediate past sale was also for $345,000 on 8/27/04.  This is one unit in a complex and it looks like this was the model.  I&#039;m purely speculating, but perhaps its ownership was transferred in a way that didn&#039;t affect it&#039;s listing status.  Just guessing, don&#039;t know for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past sales data says it last sold for $345,000 on 1/18/08 but you&#8217;re still correct.  You&#8217;ll need to follow the link to the complete listing data though I note that the immediate past sale was also for $345,000 on 8/27/04.  This is one unit in a complex and it looks like this was the model.  I&#8217;m purely speculating, but perhaps its ownership was transferred in a way that didn&#8217;t affect it&#8217;s listing status.  Just guessing, don&#8217;t know for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggi</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html/comment-page-1#comment-5092</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sandiego/2008/03/jaw_dropping_deals_-_single_family_homes_priced_under_market.html#comment-5092</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand - how could Oregon Street have sold on 2/18/08 and also have been on Redfin 141 days, that doesn&#039;t add up. It seems like both of these must have sold in &#039;07 at the previous prices listed... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand &#8211; how could Oregon Street have sold on 2/18/08 and also have been on Redfin 141 days, that doesn&#8217;t add up. It seems like both of these must have sold in &#8217;07 at the previous prices listed&#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

