Ballard: Live/Work Luxury
At last, a change from all the cookie-cutter townhouses I’ve been seeing lately.
This four-unit live/work building went for the super-trendy Dwell look, with dark cabinetry, bamboo floors, glass tile, spa-worthy fixtures, and industrial styling. While the luxe finishes are lovely, I have my doubts about some of the other design choices.
First, there’s no half bath on the middle floor, where the kitchen and living are. Second, they chose to lay a pebble finish on the master bath floor. Looks great, but when I took my shoes off and walked across, I found the unevenness uncomfortable.
Furthermore, the laundry hook-ups are in the master closet; installing them is going to cut your hanging space dramatically. Finally, there’s no fireplace and only one narrow wall of windows for the units that don’t face the street.
Despite all that, I could see these places getting snatched up fast. They’re different and, being in a commercial zone, will appeal to people who need that designation for their home-based business. The developers planned the first floor for just that scenario. The bottom level of all the units is an open space with nearly 9-foot ceilings and separate entrance. The trade-off is that, unlike the cookie cutters, this design eliminates the garage space; you park your car in an uncovered space at the front of the parcel.
STATS:
Neighborhood: Ballard
Asking: $399,950
Address: 1504 NW 52nd St., Seattle, WA 98107
Living square footage: 1296 (KCR). Lot size: 715 sq. ft. (KCR)
Bedrooms: 1 Baths: 1.5
Last sale price: new construction
MLS#: 27026037
Click here for detailed listing.


dkella said:
Helen, is your information correct? I believe that the asking price is about 500K, not 400K. That’s a pretty brutal price for 1 bdrm right off the busy and sometimes questionable 15th Avenue.
February 20, 2007 1:14 PM
Amy Helen Johnson said:
We’re both right, dkella.
They’re asking $399,950 for the unit I featured (follow the hotlinks) and for two more of the four. The remaining unit has more street exposure and more windows (stellar view of the Brown Bear car wash) — and a $499,950 asking price. It’s the end unit whose windows you see in the picture.
February 20, 2007 6:02 PM
Dan said:
Hi Helen,
How do you think these would fare in resale a few years down the line? I’m new to the whole live/work concept – though I’m sure the downstairs area can be staged/used as a game, or party area. I’d love to hear about any thoughts, or experience you’ve had with similar projects.
Thanks!
February 21, 2007 10:12 AM
Amy Helen Johnson said:
Dan,
Probably the best comparison is to live/work townhomes in the Issaquah Highlands. They’re populated with insurance agents, hairdressers, masseuses — the businesses that need commercial zoning. Fine artists, telecommuters, and freelancers (writers, programmers) can work anywhere because they don’t (usually) have customer traffic and the city regulations are lax about that kind of home-business arrangement.
I’m not convinced that a live/work designation is inherently desireable in that neighborhood. In Issaquah, sure, because the Highlands is isolated from pretty much the whole world. If you want to cater to people on that highway exit, you need to locate your business there and you don’t have many options for commercial space.
But if you run a Seattle business, then you have options for renting office space anywhere in Ballard (and other neighborhoods). So the decision comes down to — do I want to live directly above my business? Is this a good location for my business? Is the office space adequate? Is the living space attractive? Does this make financial sense?
Case in point: I talked to one agent who showed clients that building. The buyers opted for a condo on Capitol Hill instead, with separate business quarters nearby.
As a purely residential place, if you like its looks, go for it. Just be sure you’re prepared to live next door to a business (consider noise, hours of operation, parking, etc.). I guarantee you that potential buyers will, when you put it up for resale.
Amy
March 13, 2007 9:33 PM
Dan said:
I didn’t realize I was using your middle name. My apologies Amy, wups!
And thank you very much for your point of view. I actually looked at the space more for the aesthetics (large open room for entertaining). The thought of neighbors actually using the space for work didn’t immediately come to mind as a potential negative.
March 15, 2007 3:51 PM
Amy Helen Johnson said:
Big open spaces are fabulous, Dan, but this isn’t a Tribeca loft situation. This is commercial zoning. You could end up sharing a wall with anything from a convenience store to a porn theater. Seriously. Both uses are permitted in C1.
I didn’t look into whether the property had further use restrictions beyond those in the Seattle Land Use Code. You could ask the developer about the Master Use Permit and anything attached to the title. I’d also talk to a real-estate lawyer to find out what the worst-case scenario is. For example, could a neighbor change the MUP and run a bar that’s open until 2 a.m.?
Again, let me stress, without some further research, you can’t approach this property as purely housing.
This link will get you to the commercial portion of the code. Be sure you know what you’re buying here.
March 15, 2007 5:01 PM
Sandesigns said:
First of all…why would anyone put dark wood cabinetry in ANY space… especially in the Northwest when light maple is so much more aesthetically appealing? When you are trying to make a smaller space feel more light and open and inviting, dark things make it choppy and closed in. As a designer who would love to have a loft above a showroom for open studio events, I would love this type of space but it needs to be where there is traffic from people who can afford and appreciate contemporary one of a kind art.
May 29, 2007 10:09 PM