<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Benaroya Moons Over Their Denny&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2008/02/benaroya_moons_over_their_dennys.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2008/02/benaroya_moons_over_their_dennys.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Seattle Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhapsody</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2008/02/benaroya_moons_over_their_dennys.html/comment-page-1#comment-1898</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhapsody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2008/02/benaroya_moons_over_their_dennys.html#comment-1898</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if the building owner and developer would at least talk to the architects and their proposed schematic, rather than concluding, without benefit of further explanation, that the proposal won&#039;t work, or can&#039;t work.  It seems the stubbornness of the building owner is making them complicit with their future loss of value and money, rather than exploring the ideas that have been offered, and considering the options of a contract rezone, as well as tax incentives.  Instead, they continue to &#039;fight this&#039;.  Perhaps a posting of the proposed plans would help to  see how the building can be incorporated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if the building owner and developer would at least talk to the architects and their proposed schematic, rather than concluding, without benefit of further explanation, that the proposal won&#8217;t work, or can&#8217;t work.  It seems the stubbornness of the building owner is making them complicit with their future loss of value and money, rather than exploring the ideas that have been offered, and considering the options of a contract rezone, as well as tax incentives.  Instead, they continue to &#8216;fight this&#8217;.  Perhaps a posting of the proposed plans would help to  see how the building can be incorporated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

