<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redfin By The Numbers, March Edition: Redfin Agents Are Tops in King County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Seattle Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: symnSnits</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>symnSnits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>VAB выплатил $6,3 млн. по еврооблигациям. Входящий в группу крупных &lt;a href=&quot;http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VAB Банк&lt;/a&gt; (Киев) выплатил 6,3 млн. долларов по еврооблигациям, выпущенных в мае 2007 года. Об этом говорится в сообщении банка “14 декабря 2009 &lt;a href=&quot;http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VAB Банк&lt;/a&gt; выплатил пятый купон в размере 6,3 млн. долларов по трехлетним еврооблигациям с погашением в июне 2010 года”, -говорится в сообщении. Выплата купона осуществляется два раза в год по ставке 10,125% годовых. Лид-менеджерами дебютного выпуска еврооблигаций на сумму 125 млн. долларов выступили Credit Suisse International и Deutsche Bank. Как сообщалось ранее, по состоянию на 1 октября активы банка составили – 7 443,2 млн. гривен, кредиты и задолженность клиентов – 6 354,9 млн. гривен, собственный капитал – 748,6 млн. гривен. За январь-сентябрь банк получил убыток 142,716 млн. гривен, 2008 год банк закончил с чистой прибылью 2,042 млн. гривен. &lt;a href=&quot;http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VAB Банк&lt;/a&gt; является открытым акционерным обществом.По данным международного рейтингового агентства Fitch, в первом полугодии 2006 года 48,65% акций VAB Банка купила голландская инвестиционная компания TBIF, банк также контролируются российским предпринимателем Сергеем Максимовым и членами его семьи. &lt;a href=&quot;http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VAB Банк&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VAB Банк&lt;/a&gt; http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438 - VAB Банк</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VAB выплатил $6,3 млн. по еврооблигациям. Входящий в группу крупных <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">VAB Банк</a> (Киев) выплатил 6,3 млн. долларов по еврооблигациям, выпущенных в мае 2007 года. Об этом говорится в сообщении банка “14 декабря 2009 <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">VAB Банк</a> выплатил пятый купон в размере 6,3 млн. долларов по трехлетним еврооблигациям с погашением в июне 2010 года”, -говорится в сообщении. Выплата купона осуществляется два раза в год по ставке 10,125% годовых. Лид-менеджерами дебютного выпуска еврооблигаций на сумму 125 млн. долларов выступили Credit Suisse International и Deutsche Bank. Как сообщалось ранее, по состоянию на 1 октября активы банка составили – 7 443,2 млн. гривен, кредиты и задолженность клиентов – 6 354,9 млн. гривен, собственный капитал – 748,6 млн. гривен. За январь-сентябрь банк получил убыток 142,716 млн. гривен, 2008 год банк закончил с чистой прибылью 2,042 млн. гривен. <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">VAB Банк</a> является открытым акционерным обществом.По данным международного рейтингового агентства Fitch, в первом полугодии 2006 года 48,65% акций VAB Банка купила голландская инвестиционная компания TBIF, банк также контролируются российским предпринимателем Сергеем Максимовым и членами его семьи. <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">VAB Банк</a> <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">VAB Банк</a> <a href="http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438" rel="nofollow">http://eizvestia.com/news/full/4187438</a> &#8211; VAB Банк</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimMcF</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5410</link>
		<dc:creator>TimMcF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5410</guid>
		<description>I agree with the post above. It is unfair and frankly disingenuous to claim to be &quot;top agents&quot; while ignoring listings. No other agent in the market measures their success by buyers only. Other than Redfin, everyone is trying to get both buyer and seller business.

I ran the numbers on the NWMLS myself and your agents are NOT top if you include buyers and sellers. Are you somehow insinuating that an agent who works with buyers and sellers is somehow inferior to one who only works with buyers? I would argue that the former is far more valuable to the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the post above. It is unfair and frankly disingenuous to claim to be &#8220;top agents&#8221; while ignoring listings. No other agent in the market measures their success by buyers only. Other than Redfin, everyone is trying to get both buyer and seller business.</p>
<p>I ran the numbers on the NWMLS myself and your agents are NOT top if you include buyers and sellers. Are you somehow insinuating that an agent who works with buyers and sellers is somehow inferior to one who only works with buyers? I would argue that the former is far more valuable to the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Pepper</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Pepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>Kevin the simple fact is this.  500 Realty has the the &quot;Top Agents in Washington State.&quot;  Its just your marketing and definition of TOP.

Kevin don&#039;t fight and challenge Red Fin.  Just offer services and financial incentives for the consumer to utilize YOU instead of them.  Your sales numbers will most likely be the same as ours by the EOY.  

But, are you truly offering anything superior to Red Fin? Shop Prop? Handspring? 500 Realty?  The 1000&#039;s of Agents now giving 50% of their commission to Buyers?**

I think not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin the simple fact is this.  500 Realty has the the &#8220;Top Agents in Washington State.&#8221;  Its just your marketing and definition of TOP.</p>
<p>Kevin don&#8217;t fight and challenge Red Fin.  Just offer services and financial incentives for the consumer to utilize YOU instead of them.  Your sales numbers will most likely be the same as ours by the EOY.  </p>
<p>But, are you truly offering anything superior to Red Fin? Shop Prop? Handspring? 500 Realty?  The 1000&#8242;s of Agents now giving 50% of their commission to Buyers?**</p>
<p>I think not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Glew</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Glew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>Kevin-
You&#039;re right, our lead agents work with a team of field agents and associate agents. 

All the members of the team are focused on delivered great service to our clients, but at the end of the day the lead agent is responsible for the quality of the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin-<br />
You&#8217;re right, our lead agents work with a team of field agents and associate agents. </p>
<p>All the members of the team are focused on delivered great service to our clients, but at the end of the day the lead agent is responsible for the quality of the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lisota</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5400</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lisota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5400</guid>
		<description>I am not sure how you can lay claim to your agents being &quot;top agents in King county&quot; based on this data for number of deals. Your agents do more transaction than the average agent, but are supported by a network of field agents who help facilitate the transactions. Those field agents are never given credit in MLS data for a sale. If Febe closed 8 deals, how many field agents helped her in the process? That would lead to an accurate deal count on a per agent basis. As it appears, you are pitting Febe&#039;s &quot;team&quot; against thousands of individual agents who don&#039;t have teams, which isn&#039;t a fair comparison.

There are plenty of other &quot;teams&quot; being represented on the MLS, but sales data for those teams is spread out more evenly across agents on those teams. Unless you are able to reconcile that in your data, I am not sure how anyone can lay claim to being a &quot;top agent in King County&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how you can lay claim to your agents being &#8220;top agents in King county&#8221; based on this data for number of deals. Your agents do more transaction than the average agent, but are supported by a network of field agents who help facilitate the transactions. Those field agents are never given credit in MLS data for a sale. If Febe closed 8 deals, how many field agents helped her in the process? That would lead to an accurate deal count on a per agent basis. As it appears, you are pitting Febe&#8217;s &#8220;team&#8221; against thousands of individual agents who don&#8217;t have teams, which isn&#8217;t a fair comparison.</p>
<p>There are plenty of other &#8220;teams&#8221; being represented on the MLS, but sales data for those teams is spread out more evenly across agents on those teams. Unless you are able to reconcile that in your data, I am not sure how anyone can lay claim to being a &#8220;top agent in King County&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redfin by the Numbers: March Brokerage Activity Way Up, Especially on Foreclosures &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5399</link>
		<dc:creator>Redfin by the Numbers: March Brokerage Activity Way Up, Especially on Foreclosures &#124; Redfin Corporate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5399</guid>
		<description>[...] calling Redfin by the Numbers. On Monday night, Redfin&#8217;s Chris Glew put up data for the Seattle area, the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Chicagoland, the Boston area and the Washington [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] calling Redfin by the Numbers. On Monday night, Redfin&#8217;s Chris Glew put up data for the Seattle area, the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Chicagoland, the Boston area and the Washington [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geordie Romer</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5398</link>
		<dc:creator>Geordie Romer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5398</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Matt.

I figured the number of offers didn&#039;t necessarily correlate with the closings. But since you are sharing with us the number of offers written, care to share what % are being accepted? The number of offers written seems useless without more context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matt.</p>
<p>I figured the number of offers didn&#8217;t necessarily correlate with the closings. But since you are sharing with us the number of offers written, care to share what % are being accepted? The number of offers written seems useless without more context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Goyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5397</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Goyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5397</guid>
		<description>The offers above don&#039;t necessarily match up with the closes because offers from March may not close until April and so will show up on the April report instead of the March one. 

It&#039;s hard to know how we compare to other agents in Seattle because I don&#039;t believe any one else is sharing their numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The offers above don&#8217;t necessarily match up with the closes because offers from March may not close until April and so will show up on the April report instead of the March one. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to know how we compare to other agents in Seattle because I don&#8217;t believe any one else is sharing their numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geordie Romer &#124; Leavenworth WA</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5396</link>
		<dc:creator>Geordie Romer &#124; Leavenworth WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5396</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell from the charts above, but it appears as though your agents might only be getting 50% of their offers accepted. Is this accurate? How does this compare to other agents in Seattle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell from the charts above, but it appears as though your agents might only be getting 50% of their offers accepted. Is this accurate? How does this compare to other agents in Seattle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Glew</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/04/redfin_by_the_numbers_march_edition_redfin_agents_are_tops_in_king_county.html/comment-page-1#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Glew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3348#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>Susan-
Thanks for the comment. We support deals on bank-owned foreclosures, a.k.a REOs. I edited the post to make that more clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan-<br />
Thanks for the comment. We support deals on bank-owned foreclosures, a.k.a REOs. I edited the post to make that more clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

