<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redfin Has The Top Three Buyers&#8217; Agents In September</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/10/redfin_has_the_top_three_buyers_agents_in_september.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/10/redfin_has_the_top_three_buyers_agents_in_september.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Seattle Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/2009/10/redfin_has_the_top_three_buyers_agents_in_september.html/comment-page-1#comment-5662</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/seattle/?p=3988#comment-5662</guid>
		<description>It seems like the nature of a personal relationship would be a significant barrier to neutral and slightly negative responses.  Those clients would be more likely to just not respond, while very happy, mostly happy, and very unhappy folks would respond much more often.

How do you encourage uniform response rates, so that those with negative experiences also share them?

Could you actively survey, say, 10% or 20% of non-respondents, then extrapolate from those results to account for anyone else who didn&#039;t respond?

(ObDisc: I&#039;ve never been a Redfin client and am not in the real estate industry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the nature of a personal relationship would be a significant barrier to neutral and slightly negative responses.  Those clients would be more likely to just not respond, while very happy, mostly happy, and very unhappy folks would respond much more often.</p>
<p>How do you encourage uniform response rates, so that those with negative experiences also share them?</p>
<p>Could you actively survey, say, 10% or 20% of non-respondents, then extrapolate from those results to account for anyone else who didn&#8217;t respond?</p>
<p>(ObDisc: I&#8217;ve never been a Redfin client and am not in the real estate industry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

