<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed Cuts Rates by 0.5%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html</link>
	<description>Redfin Bay Area Sweet Digs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott.h</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>scott.h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Not much from a consumer&#039;s standpoint is pegged directly to the fed rate. At least some ARMs are pegged to a bank&#039;s prime rate, however, which tends to move with the fed rate.  It seems to be a lot less common for ARMs to be tied to prime though - as you indicated a lot of them are based on Libor or even treasury rates.  I probably should have made that more clear above.

Though it goes against every fiber of my being to link to an article on AOL (it&#039;s really written by the Wall Street Journal, but I think their site requires a subscription), here&#039;s a pretty good summary of what benefits may flow from yesterday&#039;s cut: &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/what-the-fed-rate-cut-means-for-you/20070919071209990001&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; AOL Article&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Not much from a consumer&#8217;s standpoint is pegged directly to the fed rate. At least some ARMs are pegged to a bank&#8217;s prime rate, however, which tends to move with the fed rate.  It seems to be a lot less common for ARMs to be tied to prime though &#8211; as you indicated a lot of them are based on Libor or even treasury rates.  I probably should have made that more clear above.</p>
<p>Though it goes against every fiber of my being to link to an article on AOL (it&#8217;s really written by the Wall Street Journal, but I think their site requires a subscription), here&#8217;s a pretty good summary of what benefits may flow from yesterday&#8217;s cut: <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/what-the-fed-rate-cut-means-for-you/20070919071209990001" rel="nofollow"> AOL Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html/comment-page-1#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.redfin.com/sfbay/2007/09/fed_cuts_rates_by_05.html#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t most ARMs pegged to LIBOR, not the fed rate?  Seems like reducing the Fed rate won&#039;t directly help people with mortgages or people that want to get mortgages.  It certainly isn&#039;t going to help people that want to get jumbo loans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t most ARMs pegged to LIBOR, not the fed rate?  Seems like reducing the Fed rate won&#8217;t directly help people with mortgages or people that want to get mortgages.  It certainly isn&#8217;t going to help people that want to get jumbo loans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

