January 27, 2008

Will the Tax Rebate Stimulate the Economy As Planned?

piggybank1 Will the Tax Rebate Stimulate the Economy As Planned?Under severe criticism for his lack of focus on the US economy, George Bush has at long last decided to do something!  Is it an effort that is a “day late and a dollar short”?  Or will it deliver the desired results, and stimulate our stalled economy – and housing market?

When considering this question, I am reminded of the old adage, “Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he eats forever”.  What will happen to the economy after John Q Public has spent this rebate – probably to catch up on aging bills or stock up on groceries for the family?  Will there be new jobs created through this approach?  Probably not.  Will there be more safety in assuming Social Security will cover the aging Baby Boomers needs?  Once again – probably not. 

According to the NPR website, many American’s will probably sock this money away in a savings account through fear that things will get worse before they get better.  If this happens, there will be NO net stimulation of the economy! 

My thoughts are that this will cost the Federal government $150B with no net effect – either positive or negative – on the economy.  

Comments anyone??


  • Brenda Keener

    Agreed! This is just a token gesture - designed to make George Bush look like he actually cares about the economy.

    I also agree it is a bad example, just like Dave said. If we already have a large budget deficit, why make it larger by sending out meaningless rebates?

  • dave peck

    We're going to borrow the money (on top of an estimated $250 billion annual deficit) to give rebates? So it will now be a $400 billion deficit?

    Is this not like a family who is spending more than it is earning going even deeper into the red?

    Doesn't seem to make sense to me.

  • David

    All it is a transfer payment from higher brackets to lower ones. There will be no net effect on the economy.

  • dg

    Doubtful this will inject much into the economy based on who is actually getting the money.

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...

  • Slappy

    There will be a net effect, a negative one when everyone saves for a rainy day, we've increased our debt by $150B dollars.

    If we're going to throw that kind of money away why not have it be for safety net items like health care, unemployment insurance, etc?

blog comments powered by Disqus
close