August 6, 2008

SF: Single Family Homes Under 600K

 SF: Single Family Homes Under 600KJenny P. has me thinking about bargains with her post promising Marin property for $200K and under.
Gas may be down a few cents but Trader Joe’s raised the price on my favorite bread and yogurt, so I don’t think we’re coming out ahead anytime soon. That’s why I have decided to look for homes– single family homes, that is– for less than $600,000.

After all, that’s plenty to spend. At $600K, if you are lucky enough to have 20% down ($120,000, people. Quite the chunk and a half to have handy), your mortage looks something like this:

** Assuming 30 year fixed at 6.5%, principal and interest would run you $3033.93 per month.

** Add in an estimated property tax based on 85% of your home’s worth (this is hard to nail down, but 85% seems a good median to me), or $7140 spread out over a year= $3628.93.

** Now add in insurance and utilities, home care/repair, and… well, good luck to you.

Most people I know don’t have $120K saved. After all, this is San Francisco, and a hard city in which to build wealth. For those who only have 10% down then, they will also have to get private mortgage insurance (PMI) for the other 10%, and the rates on that loan are often much higher than those for 30 year fixed. This could boost your monthly to $4305.17. (I crunched my numbers here, if you want to check).

Thus, in thinking of the first time buyer, those finally leaving the rent nest and flying for homes of their own, I’m dedicating these listings to you. I just can’t see the majority of people I know, though they are professionals of all kinds, buying a home for over $600K their first time ever buying at all.

I give you then, single-family homes in SF for under $600K!

NOTE: As the map alludes, most of these hail in the southerly districts, at least those listed on the MLS. Still, those areas may soon make a major rebound if Prop G delivers… so perhaps these make good investments?

727 Sweeney St.: Portola 3/1 with garage and yard for $599,900.

17 Precita Ave.: Bernal 2/1.5 Victorian with a Wedgewood stove to die for (yes, I am a kitchen dork!). No parking, and on the market quite awhile may give you bargaining power. $499,000.

2661 Harrison St.: Inner-Mission/SOMA-ish 3/2.5 that also offers rental income. Not sure if the rental part would add a bedroom or if it is included in the 3/2.5 designation. $599,000.

461 Chenery St.: 2/1 Victorian in Glen Park with nice garden. Sold for just over 600K in May of this year, and since it hit the market, it has been reduced twice, landing it at $599,900.

1214 48th Ave.: Outer Sunset tiny 2/1 with yard and garage, has been listed almost a year, so perhaps you can get it for less than $525K?


  • RJ
    20 years historical prices for housing in SFO by districs and roads : I am working on a school project and I am looking for historical prices of housing in San francisco by districs and road. It will help me to diagnose the trend in a particular locality. I am sure many of the realtors have this data. I would appreciate if you can provide me the data. Please contact me ==> rondevouz@gmail.com
  • David
    Well, you can get a nice 1000-1500 sq ft condo in decent parts of Chicago for under $300K, and you won't be stuck someplace like the Sunset (which, honestly, is not "City living," it's more like an internal suburb). A livable house in Chicago proper is still gonna cost you at least $400K (Jefferson Park), and in a good 'hood (equal in amenities to Noe Valley, i.e. Lincoln Square, Roscoe Village, North Center, Andersonville/Uptown) will cost you at least $550-$650K.

    If you're a school teacher, you have a portable job, again, if I were in your position, you better believe I'd be high-tailing it to any one of the charming, pretty cultured mid-size cities in the US that are actually affordable on that salary (Portland, Madison, Iowa City, Bloomington Indiana, Charlottesville, Raleigh-Durham, Nashville, Chattanooga, Fort Collins, Bellingham, that town where Dartmouth is, Hudson river valley in NY State, some smaller towns in Connecticut, etc etc). YOu have summers off? Road trip! :) Find the spot for you. or stick around here, but realize yeah, you're probably not buying a house in SF proper.
  • Anna
    yes, true, that's why i went "lowball" with the 600K cap. You're probably right that one could live in Oakland for cheaper, but commuting to my job and school would be expensive and horrible, plus I am afriad of Oakland.

    Also, with the prices of food, gas, commuting, rent, utilities, and parking tickets, well, it would take me a long time indeed on a teacher salary to raise 120K. Of course, your point is well made that if I can't save as much as this, I can't afford a 600K house at all. I'm well aware I cannot.

    Sigh!

    Maybe I should try Chicago. I know you always compare it to here...
  • David
    Don't live in SF. Rent in Oakland for a few years before you save enough money to "move up" to your SF hood. Additionally, "cheap rental" means cheaper than buying. If you're anticipating shelling out $4K/year in payments, there are plenty of rentals for $2500/year. That saves you $18,000/year (you should definitely be able to save that, after all, how are you going to make your payments if you can't save the difference between rent & PITI)? Last time I checked (well, ok, my brother), you could easily rent a house in the Sunset for $2400/month.

    And as you point out, if all you can afford is $600K, you're not living anywhere more expensive than the Sunset (and even then, it's hard to find a spot at that price there).
  • Anna
    emphasis on cheap rental. I have never found one in the 10 years I've lived here; frankly prices have gone from bad to worse.
  • David
    If you're anticipating buying in SF, and your minimum payment is ~$4,000, that means your household income should be at least $120,000. You should have been able to save $120,000 for your down payment by being frugal for a few years and living in a cheap rental.
blog comments powered by Disqus
close