September 7, 2008

Preparing for Earthquakes in the Bay Area: Not a Passive Process

Our recent tremblor reminds us, in case we forgot, that we’re living on multiple fault lines in the Bay Area. I never forget, though admit freely that when I run out of food or first aid stuff or bottled water, I almost always go through my earthquake provisions before I go to the store. Mainly because I hate going to the store. I am well aware this is kind of like driving without a seatbelt, but … less obviously dangerous.

Still, the danger of quakes is real. For evidence, here’s a map, most recently posted on The Front Steps, that shows which areas in the city are built on landfill as opposed to bedrock (the latter being much safer).

 Preparing for Earthquakes in the Bay Area:  Not a Passive Process

The “very high” areas in red refer to areas most subject to liquefaction, a frightening sounding process indeed. (See more on Bay Area seismic dangers here. ) You might note that some of the most expensive property, like the Marina, and the majority of new construction, such as South Beach, is in that red zone.

San Francisco government does not rely on your common sense alone to protect you from the danger of earthquakes. As reported in May, Mayor Newsom has a plan to require homeowners to retrofit unsafe foundations: His new plan would require homeowners, particularly those with “soft-story” buildings, such as first floor garages, to retrofit their buildings with seismic upgrades. This they would do out of their own pockets, which made some owners angry as they seemed to think preparation was a choice.

Homeowner or not, the Bay Area offers much by way of earthquake preparation.  One excellent resource is the Community Emergency Response Team  (CERT) training, offered in many cities including our local ones. And incidentally, CERT addresses other national disasters as well, including fire and flood, which are both logical side effects of a big quake.

In any case, being prepared is more than having a couple of bandaids and a bottle of water at the ready. These little tremblors remind us all not to be stupid, to buckle our metaphoric seatbelts.

(And maybe, not to buy in the Marina– unless the building has a solid retrofit!)

  


  • Red

    Hmm, should the city pay for the airbags in your car? Do you buy a car without safety equipment because you wouldn't mind being dead?
    I suppose you expect the city to rebuild your house after it is destroyed in a quake? You are paying for earthquake insurance, right? You do realize that has an enormous deductible, probably more than the cost of the retrofits?
    Look, I suffered a huge loss because of a quake and could have avoided it by doing the retrofits. I was stupid. I am hoping you are smarter than I was.

  • Helen G.

    at whose expense though? We can barely make our mortgage as it is!!!!!!! Is the city going to help us pay for this retrofit requirement?

  • Red

    Absolutely, anyone who hasn't done the basic earthquake retrofits should be required to. This is very cheap insurance compared to the costs you will have after the earthquake.
    The 1989 quake did enormous damage in SF and the bay area, but that was a Santa Cruz quake, 70 miles away. I owned a nice little Santa Cruz place that twisted halfway off its foundation, and putting it back cost a fortune; maybe a tenth of that in work before the quake could have prevented it completely. The place next door dropped four feet and had to be bulldozed, so I consider myself lucky.

blog comments powered by Disqus
close