September 19, 2008

Time to Buy……or Hide?

economic depression Time to Buy......or Hide?Prices have dropped below even the wildest expectations of potential buyers, yet the summer increase in sales is drying up rapidly in the face of the failures of financial stalwarts AIG, Merrill Lynch, and Lehman Bros, as well as the bailouts of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. 

Rewards could be handsome for investors with the guts to face these events and move forward – yet the risks include losing everything if the markets actually collapse. 

From the San Jose Mercury News, Chief Economist for Quicken Loans, Bob Walters was quoted as saying,

“Whenever there’s turmoil, it’s a natural human emotion to go into a defensive mind-set and choose to do nothing.Buying when everyone else is afraid and selling when everyone else is greedy tends to be beneficial over time. But why don’t more people put it into practice? It’s hard to do. It’s hard to buy when you are scared, and it’s hard to sell when you’re greedy.”

What risks do home buyers face?  There is wide spread speculation that global markets are in a state of collapse that rivals that of the Great Depression of 1929. If so, then reaping ROI from a home purchase now may never happen, as the entire currency structure could change.  But how likely is this?  The US economy is among the strongest in the world, and emergency measures such as a temporary halt to all short trading have been enacted.  If it is inconceivable that the US economy could collapse, and I believe it is, then opportunity for upside still exists as it is inherent to a democracy. 

The other question that defines risk is how long will it take for the market to recover?  The Great Depression was a ten year span – should we expect another ten years to go by before our investments bear fruit?   In my opinion (and I am no economist but have had the great fortune to study Economics under one of the greatest profs in the world), the answer to this can be found by studying the difference in transaction time between the two eras.  In the late 1920s, the Internet with its lightening speed transactions did not exist.  Deposits were made to banks by hand, and the US mail carried most sensitive material as faxes did not exist.  The pace of life moves much faster today – which means the near catastrophes we are experiencing now happened quickly, and a recovery can also happen quickly.   

The biggest impediment to a speedy recovery is the red tape associated with the buyout logistics, and the renewal of consumer confidence in the traditional markets.   My best guestimate as to the length of time we will take to recovery is then five years, not ten as in the Great Depression.

But I do believe we have entered into a Depression – and all attempts to call it anything else are attempts to head off the impact by pretending it isn’t happening.  

If you review the history of the Great Depression, many businesses emerged as did the Phoenix from the ashes – portending that those who have the courage and strength to fight the fear and continue to invest will eventually reap even greater rewards for their leap of faith.

Some examples of businesses that actually increased advertising spending during the Great Depression include Kelloggs, Proctor and Gamble, and Chevrolet. All flourished and won out over competition during and after the Depression.  Radio advertising saw a huge growth spurt during this time as well, showing that there is money to be made even in a down economy by driving or even spotting key trends.  

In conclusion – yes, things are bad.  But hiding will not solve anything, and by investing and not losing heart if things continue to worsen before getting better – savvy capitalists stand to show even stronger profits when this mess is behind us and school children are writing papers about the “Great Depression of 2008″.  

I suggest taking the plunge, but only if you are looking for a healthy longer term investment.  Short term thinking is part of what got us into this mess in the first place!


Comments (8)

MDAccount said:

I’m one of those searching for my first home. One of my benchmarks from the beginning has been that the monthly cost of ownership (PITI) must be LOWER than my current rent, without factoring in the additional tax savings.

In this market it is possible, and I see it primarily as locking in a lifetime fixed rent, and secondarily as an investment that might eventually bring gains. I know that there are additional costs of ownership — repairs, maintenance, etc. — but I also won’t take the plunge without an emergency fund equal to six months rent in the bank.

If I meet those goals, I think buying is still the best way to go.

sw said:

“Prices have dropped below even the wildest expectations of potential buyers” Uh, no. In all but the most undesirable areas mortgage payments are still far higher than rent on a comparable house. This bust will not be over until that is no longer true.

brenda.keener said:

MD – you have a solid strategy and I agree, go ahead and buy! SW – if you look at the South Bay geographically, much of it is the San Jose area and is considerably down from prior years.

Laurel said:

Hmm..we’re looking for our first house too–but it seems that buying will cost us just about double what our rent does now–and for a house not as big with a smaller yard. Its tough, but I’m sick of renting.

paul said:

I guess my biggest concern isn’t so much the interest rates nor how low home prices will go, it’s will I have a job in the next 6 months? I wondering what kind of trickling affect this will have. None of this will matter if I can no longer make mortgage payments :P

Janis Mara said:

MDAccount, I think you have nailed it. Rents will always go up in the long run, but a 30-year fixed mortgage is just that – fixed.

Paul, I’m totally with you. Last week’s events will change the world, and most particularly, our world. Essentially, the second great depression in the U.S. began last week. I’ve been making a list of industries – health care, green-related such as solar – that I believe will continue to do well, in the interest of job-hunting.

And, GREAT post, Brenda.

MDAccount said:

I agree that, in most parts of the bay area, prices are still too high in comparison with rents. That’s why I’m buying in Vallejo, where the housing crash hit first and hit hard. The median home price is about $275K these days.

I’m also concerned about employment six months from now, which is why A) I’ve got a six month reserve of living expenses and B) the mortgage will be low enough that friends and family would be able to assist if the situation became completely dire.

Finally, I’m talking with a friend about moving into any house I purchase, just to allow both of us to save cash.

I do not think things are going to be as bad as in the ’30s (I don’t see 25% unemployment coming), but I think we’re going to suffer some lean years.

Janis, I think you’re right to target certain industries. It could well be that tremendous growth in a specific sector (alternative energy, for example) could re-invigorate the economy. Let’s hope so, anyway!

brenda.keener said:

Employment is a serious concern for all of us – I think Janis has the best idea, which is to make a list of trend setting industries and then try and crack into one. We have to find the “radio broadcasting” sector of this depression.

Post your comment




close