SF: 2nd Best City for Singles. Really?
Of all the cities in the USA, which would you think most inviting for single people? Thanks to Redfin’s Sweet Digs blog in Boston, I’ve discovered that Forbes.com lists San Francisco as the 2nd best city for singles to live in.
This news surprises me a little. I’d think New York, Chicago, Atlanta, DC…. San Francisco would occur to me too, eventually. I mean, I live here. As a single person I met many men, also (we hope) single, over the course of a decade enjoying this city’s activities, clubs, night life, community, and culture. But it took me all those years to find a man I could actually consider a life with.
After all, this is not an easy city to really settle into. Most people are here for the short term, escaping small towns to partake in urban excitement. We don’t, most of us, really think we’ll ever be able to afford a home here; we don’t like to think of putting our future children in the public school lottery; we cannot imagine trying to find parking for every soccer game, grocery trip, doctor’s appointment. This is a transitory city. We meet lots of attractive, interesting, smart and talented singles, but we can’t count on them to be here in a few months, to say nothing of a few years. Thus, it’s a fabulous place for hook-ups and flings. Not sure it’s the best choice to search for a long-term relationship.
Indeed, most of my married friends with kids are planning their move to a more child friendly, less expensive, locale. Maybe that’s a reason SF made it to one a “best of” list for singles– not many middle-class familes can make it here, so largely, singles own the place.
How did Forbes decide the winning cities, exactly? The methodology for this ranking is interesting, but (surprise!) not very scientific, because along with measurable factors like job growth, “coolness” has also been considered.
Still, who could argue San Francisco is not cool? Not me, or I’d have taken my single or coupled self out of here long ago. And anyway, Forbes has got to know something, right? Don’t those people have a direct line to Wall Street/Time-Warner/God?
So, you’re now convinced, or at least intrigued. Ready for your shot at this hot city for living solo? Here are a few homes that might fit your bachelor/bachelorette lifestyle. All of these listings are less than $650K, to leave some room for the good clothes, the expensive booze, the shows, the cover charges, and the parking tickets so endemic of dating in SF.
1. 2671 Bryant: a 1/1 TIC in the hipster Inner Mission for $399,388.
2. 380 10th St., #8: A sexy 1/1 loft in the SOMA for $599K.
3. 8 Jordan Ave., #12: Laurel Heights (so you can pick up on all the USF hotties) 1/1 condo for $550K.
4. 145 Gardenside Dr., 11: Twin Peaks (so you can pick up on all the Castro hotties) 1/1 condo for $499K. Red walls= insta-love-shack.
ROLL CREDITS:
- Thanks to Tracey Taylor, for the tip that engendered this blog post.
- Thanks to Love Sessions.com for the graphic used here.
Sasha said:
OMG I am laughing my a– off. GREAT post. THis is not an easy city for single gals, but the search goes on, and I for one, enjoy it
October 5, 2008 9:32 PM
susan.brady said:
Last week there was a related article that listed San Francisco as 1st in this category, according to Sperling’s Best Places to Live. To quote”San Francisco seems to attract single people like a good pickup line, if there is such a thing. Compared to every other metro area in the U.S., the San Francisco region, which includes areas south like San Mateo and Redwood City, has the highest percentage of single people.”
Here is the link to the article:
http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/going-solo-in-the-usa.html;_ylc=X3oDMTFpaTViZTJvBF9TAzI3MTYxNDkEX3MDOTc2MjA0NjUEc2VjA2ZwLXRvZGF5BHNsawNnb2luZy1zb2xv
October 6, 2008 8:53 AM
sc said:
It would make sense if the rating included Silicon Valley, but not SF proper. I moved there with my hubby almost 2 years ago, and we noticed big groups of single girls out all the time with no guys. It was very strange. I was very happy to be married in SF, as it seemed like a tough place to be a single female. I never saw a single guy the whole time I lived there who I found attractive. Most of the guys in San Francisco are too effeminate for my taste.
They should start a dating service where they bus the single girls from SF down to Silicon Valley to meet the single guys.
October 6, 2008 12:11 PM
David said:
No, they need a dating service where you import Midwestern guys.
My brother, who’s short, with an unstable job and balding (but I admit, he has a good personality) has no problem finding women. Why? Because, to your point, he’s NOT effeminate. People here don’t realize just how big of pansies the local boys are. Not that I care, but still, it’s ridiculous. Learn how to change your own oil, drink whiskey and be a man.
October 6, 2008 12:19 PM
Mark said:
HAH so true– we call San Jose “Man Jose” as there are a million guys, alone, all with great jobs, and maybe 10 women total. That’s why so many Jose dudes hit the city on the weekend (hello, brige and tunnel)
October 6, 2008 3:30 PM
Melissa B said:
i think SF has a lot to offer a single: lots of stuff to do, lots of fun places to go and see, tons of talented and smart people. As for a long term partner, that I havwn’t found myself, but at least I am enjoying being single in the meantime!!
October 6, 2008 5:08 PM
mrbogue said:
Sorry SF guys, you’re only small fish in a big pond. Leave the girl-getting to the whales:
http://www.chahal.com/
October 8, 2008 2:11 PM
Anna said:
Mr. B: thanks for the best laugh I’ve had this week
October 8, 2008 4:58 PM