Case-Shiller: San Francisco Home Prices Getting Hammered
While most of us were out enjoying the holiday break last week, the folks at S&P/Case-Shiller released the latest data for their home price indices, which provides the most accurate measure of single-family home price trends for twenty markets across the country. Since S&P’s coverage conveniently includes each of the eight markets that Redfin provides service in, let’s take a look at the home price data from the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (HPI).
I apologize for my tardiness in this post. Future posts regarding the Case-Shiller data will be more timely.
Before we get to the charts, let me give a brief explanation of what the Case-Shiller HPI is. To calculate the index, they look at repeat sales of single-family homes over an “arms-length” period of time. Home sales that include things like major remodels, property splits, and sales between family members are disregarded, and sale pairs are weighted based on the length of time between each sale. After all this, the current month’s data is used to calculate a three-month rolling average which is the reported HPI. Data is released on the last Tuesday of every month, for the period two months prior (i.e. – September data is released in November).
For a more detailed explanation of their full process, check out their methodology pdf.
Here are the basic Case-Shiller stats for the San Francisco area* as of September:
September 2008
Month to Month: Down 3.9%
Year to Year: Down 29.5%
Change from Peak: Down 33.4%
The following chart shows the San Francisco HPI scaled such that the May 2006 peak is 100% on the y-axis. Data on the x-axis is scaled to display the last time (pre-peak) the San Francisco HPI was at or lower than it was in the latest data (May 2003).

Home prices in San Francisco have been in rapid decline since late last year (after starting out the decline slowly), and according to the September data, that trend does not appear to be slowing down soon. San Francisco’s drop of nearly 4% was the largest month-to-month decline among the twenty cities tracked by Case-Shiller.
Here’s a chart of Case-Shiller HPIs for all the markets that Redfin serves, so you can compare San Francisco’s performance to other areas across the country:

And here’s one more chart, in which I have lined up the peak Case-Shiller HPI value for each of Redfin’s markets, so we can see how long each market has been declining, and how much it has dropped from the peak.

Price declines in San Francisco have been surprisingly large, considering that home prices did not get as ridiculously high as other California cities such as Los Angeles and San Diego. At the peak, San Francisco’s HPI was right in the middle of the Redfin-serviced pack, with an HPI higher than Boston, Chicago, and Seattle, but lower than Los Angeles, San Diego, and Washington. As of September, San Francisco now has the lowest HPI of the bunch.
Home sellers in San Francisco would do well to price their homes accordingly in the area’s especially harsh market. Compared to a couple years ago, home buyers can find some amazing deals, but anyone looking to buy right now should definitely go in with a full awareness that continued price declines are highly likely at this point.
*[Case-Shiller defines San Francisco as the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes all of the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo.]
smurfett said:
if it includes some of the outlaying counties, like CoCo county, I’m not surprised it’s such a huge drop. The price drops over there is astounding. But inner Bay isn’t as much it looks like. I wish they’d break up these metro areas more.
December 2, 2008 9:54 PM
David said:
well, it’s true that SF proper hasn’t declined much, but it will.
It’s still a very useful index, as prices in, say, Chicago, are similar–bigger declines in the outer ‘burbs, smaller declines in desirable closer-in ‘hoods.
So, say what you will about CoCo, it’s still true I think that overall SF area has become *relatively* cheap. I know my mortgage payments & taxes are lower than they were in Chicago, but I’m not living in SF either.
December 3, 2008 8:50 PM
John said:
Case-Shiller has “tiered” indices for low, medium, and high priced homes. (I recall reading somewhere that “high priced” meant $770K and up.) The high priced tier peaked in Aug 07 and has fallen about 14 percent since then. The low priced tier (which I presume is homes in outlying Contra Costa and the like) has fallen almost exactly 50 percent from its 2006 peak.
December 5, 2008 3:30 PM
tim said:
do you have submarket data? i’m considering a move to the SF area, and know that the city, the Valley, the East Bay and the central valley each has its own story. I need to be able to at least guess at a bottom, probably somewhere in the East Bay. A lor of homes in the Valley are still ludicrously close to $1,000 a foot: The top listing in Mountain View is 1.1 million and change for 1,240 square feet. I think that’s nuts and I’m from New York!
all in, including low property taxes, the East Bay and the nicer parts of Oakland can be done reasonably. But how much farther down before one can play the bottom? And if one pursues a foreclosure now, can they be had cheaply enough to insulate you against at least most of the deflation still in the pipeline?
December 15, 2008 9:55 PM
Missy said:
I would wait to buy in the Bay Area. These prices are going to continue downward after the first of the year when even more homes are coming back on the market. Right now a lot of people are waiting till after the holidays to place their home back on the market. It’s going to be flooded even MORE with homes. Plus the amount of foreclosures. Check the local papers for the notices of foreclosures – tons are coming up.
SF proper is still WAY overpriced and expensive. It loves to tell itself how “important” it is, but the truth is, they have just as many if not MORE foreclosures than everyone else.
If you’re interested in moving to SF, luxury condo place One Rincon Hill is now in the 500’s, down from 700’s.
http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2008/12/one_rincon_hill_from_the_500s_700s_500s.html#comments
December 25, 2008 11:33 AM
Mark said:
I live in San Jose and work as a software engineer, and my salary has not gone up in 8 years (HP). Meanwhile, housing prices have doubled. Hello! The housing prices were propped up by easy mortgage money and stock market-fueled down payments. Both of those factors are gone. Add to that layoffs and you have a recipe for year-2000 level home prices. Do not buy yet! Use redfin to see what properties were selling for in 2000, add 10% to avoid missing the bottom and buy at that level. I think it will take at least a year to hit bottom. We haven’t seen the effect of the impending automaker bankruptcies yet.
December 30, 2008 11:01 AM