March 31, 2009

Case-Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Rewound to October 2000

It’s time once again for our monthly check-in of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (HPI).

For an explanation of how the Case-Shiller data is calculated, check out their methodology pdf. Also remember that the data released on the last Tuesday of a given month is for the period two months prior (i.e. – January data is released in March).

Here are the basic Case-Shiller stats for the San Francisco Bay Area* as of January:

January 2009
Month to Month: Down 4.4%
Year to Year: Down 32.4%
Change from Peak: Down 43.1% in 32 months

The following chart shows the Bay Area HPI scaled such that the May 2006 peak is 100% on the y-axis. Data on the x-axis is scaled to display the last time (pre-peak) the Bay Area HPI was at or lower than it was in the latest data (October 2000).

sf case shiller peak 2009 01 Case Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Rewound to October 2000

Thanks to a little mini-boom and bust in 2001 compared to a steady and steep decline in 2009, home prices in the Bay Area “rewound” seventeen months from December to January. The Bay Area is by far the furthest rewound market of those that Redfin serves.

Here’s a chart of Case-Shiller HPIs for all the markets that Redfin serves, so you can compare Bay Area’s performance to other areas across the country:

case shiller redfin markets 2009 01 Case Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Rewound to October 2000

And here’s our final chart, in which we line up the peak Case-Shiller HPI value for each of Redfin’s markets, so we can see how long each market has been declining, and how much it has dropped from the peak.

case shiller peak declines 2009 01 Case Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Rewound to October 2000

At 43% off their peak, home prices in the Bay Area have fallen further than every market Redfin serves, and are “bested” in the entire 20-city Case-Shiller sample by only Phoenix and Las Vegas.

Keep in mind that Case-Shiller’s definition of the Bay Area is fairly broad, so it is certain that home shoppers out there right now will be finding some neighborhoods where prices have not fallen as far, and others that have fallen further.

*[Case-Shiller defines the San Francisco Bay Area as the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes all of the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo.]


  • Ken
    I'm surprised this isn't one of your favorite blogs:

    http://www.doctorhousingbubble...

    Thanks for the graph. Cheers.
  • Mac
    The real economy by all estimates will continue to shrink for the remaining of this year and will probably bottom out sometime next year and will stay flat until the end of next year and after that will have a moderate growth at best. Home prices have direct correlation with economic growth or decline, therefore; fall of yet another 15-20% of home prices in bay area by the end of this year certainly sounds very reasonable, my estimate is that at that point it will continue its decline until fall of next year, although at a slower rate.
  • 4square
    This graph is more meaningful in the context of a bit longer time frame. For instance, you refer to 'a little mini boom' in 2001, but these data clearly show that the run-up in prices during 2001 was simply a continuation of the run-up that began around 1997 or so. The author's presentation gives the appearance that prices are now close to the same levels they were before the steep upward trend began, which is not the case at all.
  • HHB
    The CME Futures on the SF Case-Shiller predicts the index will continue to fall.

    For example, a home priced at $600k at the peak is now down to $341k... and expected to fall to $291k by year-end.

    Click my name to see the graph.

    My guess is that much of this future decline will come from the areas that have yet to be hit hard.

    BTW... Great chart at Calculated Risk. Thanks.
  • The highly recommended finance blog Calculated Risk did an analysis today of San Francisco's tiered price breakdown.

    They found that homes priced in the low range (likely those in the further-out areas) have fallen much farther and faster than those in the middle and high tiers.
  • Justin Steele
    Thanks for the information. I agree that this data is pretty misleading. East Contra Costa County and other hard hit areas account for the most sales, but areas that I have been looking in are down only 10-20% since the peak. Still waiting.
  • Sorry John, the Case-Shiller data is what it is. They don't provide any breakouts into smaller geographical regions. You can visit the site (linked at the beginning of the post) and download a breakdown into three price tiers, but that probably won't really be especially helpful for what you're looking for.
  • John Fanelli
    Hi,

    Thanks for posting this data. I live in San Francisco and I agree that the Bay Area Definition is very broad. Can you run the data by county, rather than just Bay Area. In particular, I would be interested in San Francisco and San Mateo counties.

    thanks

    john
blog comments powered by Disqus
close