Case-Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Still in Apparent Near-Freefall
It’s time once again for our monthly check-in of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (HPI).
For an explanation of how the Case-Shiller data is calculated, check out their methodology pdf. Also remember that the data released on the last Tuesday of a given month is for the period two months prior (i.e. – February data is released in April).
Here are the basic Case-Shiller stats for the San Francisco Bay Area* as of February:
February 2009
Month to Month: Down 3.2%
Year to Year: Down 31.0%
Change from Peak: Down 44.9% in 33 months
The following chart shows the Bay Area HPI scaled such that the May 2006 peak is 100% on the y-axis. Data on the x-axis is scaled to display the last time (pre-peak) the Bay Area HPI was at or lower than it was in the latest data (August 2000).

The Bay Area HPI is now up to approximately an eight and a half year rewind. Even if we accept the premise that this is due in large part to the broad geographical area covered by the Case-Shiller data, that means that there are likely some places where prices are comparable to the 1990s.
Here’s a chart of Case-Shiller HPIs for all the markets that Redfin serves, so you can compare the Bay Area’s performance to other areas across the country:

And here’s our final chart, in which we line up the peak Case-Shiller HPI value for each of Redfin’s markets, so we can see how long each market has been declining, and how much it has dropped from the peak.

Of the 20 cities tracked by Case-Shiller, only Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Miami have fallen further from their respective peaks than San Francisco has. The decline here has been swift and stunning, and as of yet has shown little sign of easing. Yikes.
*[Case-Shiller defines the San Francisco Bay Area as the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes all of the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo.]
HHB said:
Good graphs Tim. I’d be interested if you could take the first one further back to see where a 50% decline would start. 2000? 1999?
I updated the graph on my site that includes the CME Futures data (click my name to view it).
They still predict we hit a 50% decline by September.
April 30, 2009 9:14 AM
Daniel said:
Is there a source of real estate pricing information that breaks this data down by more specific regions? Marin County is very different from Contra Costa County, and San Mateo is different from Alameda. It seems like this info is not equally applicable in all areas of the Bay, and some places may fall another 15% (Contra Costa) while others (Marin) have buyers rushing in to snap up houses above asking price with 50% down payments.
April 30, 2009 10:21 PM
HHB said:
OFHEO has home price indexes by smaller regions. Here is a link to a site where you can graph all of them:
http://www.housedata.info/CA/
May 4, 2009 11:36 AM
Jim,MtnViewCA,USA said:
here is another terrific site with detailed info on trends in foreclosures, mortgages, REO and the like.
http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/blog/
after a brief delay, foreclosures are ramping up again. just in time for the summer selling season
May 15, 2009 12:44 PM
Mark in SF said:
So how come prices in the *CITY* if San Francisco are still about 80% more than they were in 2000? San Francisco was double the price of, say, Contra Costa pre-bubble. But post bubble it’s triple? Somebody please explain.
My theory: the fall back to normality just is taking longer here, because loan recasts are at 5 years, not 2.
May 22, 2009 6:10 PM
Home prices still too high. - San Francisco - California (CA) - Page 6 - City-Data Forum said:
[...] was from a month ago, but I found the data interesting: Case-Shiller: Bay Area Home Prices Still in Apparent Near-Freefall | Redfin Bay Area Sweet Digs [+] Rate this post [...]
May 25, 2009 9:41 AM